Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate book. Happy reading Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate Pocket Guide.

Jump to navigation. Terry Eagleton is many things, all of which converge into intelligent passion and a command of thinking beyond ideological comfort zones. He is a Marxist literary critic and political commentator with hugely respectful engagement with the revolutionary claims of Christian faith.

Reason, Faith and Revolution

He can be variously puckish, flamboyant, outrageous and erudite—or better, all of these at the same time. In Reason , Faith , and Revolution , he presents four of his Terry Lectures at Yale that constitute a frolicking commentary on the assault that Richard Daw kins and Christopher Hitchens have mounted against religion. In fact, in general, his over-the-top wit is only exhilirating until it becomes tedious, by about page 3. There is virtually no evidence that Eagleton thinks he can learn anything from these thinkers — he even blames them for not going far enough in criticizing the horrors of religious violence that he already condemns.

The book is full of false dichotomies —or saying "the difference between science and theology Science has its high priests, sacred cows, revered scriptures, ideological exclusions, and rituals for suppressing dissent" Mar 17, Maggie rated it it was amazing Shelves: non-fiction , religious-inspirational-books , essay-collection. Terry Eagleton is smart. Apr 17, Ross rated it liked it. The second half of this book is interesting, but you could probably just as well read some Zizek instead and none of that would be anywhere near as annoying as the first half of this book. That's where he gives his pet version of what Christianity's really about, and it turns out Christianity doesn't think Jesus was divine or even that God really "exists.

Basically a person can say whatever they want about Jesus, and there's a lot of value in what he does say about him and about "faith" in The second half of this book is interesting, but you could probably just as well read some Zizek instead and none of that would be anywhere near as annoying as the first half of this book.

Basically a person can say whatever they want about Jesus, and there's a lot of value in what he does say about him and about "faith" in general, but you have to at least ask why so many people have believed something totally different for so long. Also Terry Eagleton I accuse you of not being funny and making way too many bad, unhelpful analogies. Still worth reading overall but just barely! May 06, Marge rated it really liked it. After reading Stanley Fish's blog review of Eagleton's book and then finding O'Hehir's review on Salon, I rushed to my library, which had the book, and I read it -- all in the same day!

I've read Eagleton before, with pleasure, and this book, which I might have been able to follow more easily had it been written to be read, rather than as lectures, kept me involved throughout. Eagleton's passionate argument for a closer look at the actual Biblical Christ and the connection of that Christ to suff After reading Stanley Fish's blog review of Eagleton's book and then finding O'Hehir's review on Salon, I rushed to my library, which had the book, and I read it -- all in the same day!


  • English for Sales and Purchasing.
  • John Cornwell - A Dig at Ditchkins | Literary Review | Issue ;
  • "Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate" By Terry Eagleton – White Horse Inn.

Eagleton's passionate argument for a closer look at the actual Biblical Christ and the connection of that Christ to suffering humanity moved me deeply. His angry and at times witty attacks on sloppy thinking, wherever he finds it - whether in liberalism or in atheism, were convincing. I am glad I read this book. Apr 11, Anna Keating rated it it was amazing Shelves: recommended.

The faith and reason chapter was superb.

How delightful to read someone so funny and so attuned to the revolutionary character of the gospel and the ways in which it has been distorted. Since branding others The faith and reason chapter was superb. Since branding others as inferior because of their race is no longer acceptable, relegating them to the outer darkness because of their religion may serve instead. May 10, Paul Rhodes rated it liked it. Terry Eagleton is a funny, astute guy. He is a also my kind of guy, a theist and a leftist. Too bad he thinks Papal Infallibility is a joke. By the way, Jeri, who apparently is still a "friend" of mine thinks Papal Infallibility is joke, too.


  1. Book Review: Terry Eagleton, Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate..
  2. Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate (review)!
  3. Ada, or Ardor: A Family Chronicle?
  4. That's why she will defer to Scalia and not the Pope on matters of the Death Penalty. Her desire to kill apparently is stronger than her devotion to her faith. Sep 17, Lisa rated it liked it. I am in love with Eagleton's arguments on this topic, but my favorite presentation of them is still his article on Dawkin's God Delusion in the London Review of Books, entitled "Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching.

    Jan 04, Ryan Jacob rated it liked it Shelves: non-fiction. Eagleton is always charming and witty in that British academic way.

    A don defends the Supreme Being from the new atheists.

    The content is "meh" though in terms of really adding much to the topic. Still gave me room to reflect on some of ideas and quips, even if they didn't always make sense together. Caveat: didn't finish the book. Didn't feel the need to.

    God in the Quad

    Jun 30, Anwesh Satpathy rated it it was ok. Terry Eagleton is perhaps one of the most influential contemporary Marxist literary theorist and intellectuals in the world. He is also sympathetic to Christianity. I was prepared to be confronted by a rational and reasonable breakdown of Dawkins and Hitchens.

    Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate - Terry Eagleton - Google книги

    That's not what happened. Eagleton from the beginning admits that he knows "embarrassingly little about science and religio Terry Eagleton is perhaps one of the most influential contemporary Marxist literary theorist and intellectuals in the world. Eagleton from the beginning admits that he knows "embarrassingly little about science and religion.

    Halfway through, I realized that Prof. Eagleton is no Christian at all. I was annoyed when he started stating demonstrably false and ambivalent statements about the Bible.

    Rethinking public religion: Word, image, sound

    In the whole book, Prof. Eagleton rarely quotes the Bible or his sources. This allows him to make a commodious argument. It is technically true that Aquinas was ready to concede the possibility of an eternal universe, however, that had nothing to do with God not being the creator of the universe. Aquinas argued that the very existence of the universe or "fact of creation" as he termed it was dependent upon God, the creator. Not to mention the fact that he believed in a literal reading of the Genesis.

    Yes,he made way for some flexibility but the creation of Adam and Eve was a settled Christian doctrine. So why did God create the universe?

    Have your say

    Eagleton says " for the hell of it. In other words, a deistic God. Not "an interventionist like George Bush". Needless to say, this is in contradiction with the God of the Bible who cares very much about his creation and often feels the need to intervene. He derisively refers to Dawkins and Hitchens and "Ditchkins". The book is full of useless ad hominem. Some of which I'll mention below:- " Without God, Dawkins would be out of a job. Public Science himself It wasn't hard to decipher the motivations of the author.

    He doesn't have any theological disagreement with Dr.


    1. Minds Eye!
    2. Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?!
    3. Debatable Space?
    4. Mastering Arabic Script: A Guide to Handwriting;
    5. A River Runs Through It and Other Stories (25th Anniversary Edition)!
    6. Dawkins and Prof.